Home / Projects
COPPER · PRE-REJECTION

Anhui Lujiang Copper: 94.7% Recovery, 38% Waste Rejected

Low-grade feed at 0.20% Cu still justified pre-concentration — recovery held at 94.7% while 38% of mass left the circuit, and a 1 Mt/a plant was designed on the result.

94.72%recovery
1 Mt/aplant designed

Test data (0.5–8 mm)

Dense medium test results — yield, grade and recovery by product
ProductYield %Grade %Recovery %
Concentrate61.780.3194.72
Rejects38.220.035.28
Feed100.000.20100.00

From test to plant

The economics scale directly: every rejected tonne saves grinding energy (~40% of a concentrator's power bill). The campaign concluded with a preliminary design for a 1,000,000 t/a pre-rejection plant.

Ore & background

At 0.20% Cu, the Lujiang ore sits below many operations' cut-off grade — the textbook candidate for the pre-concentration argument. If rejection cannot make this ore pay, it stays in the ground; if it can, a resource gets converted into reserves.

Reading the results

The cut rejected 38.22% of mass at 0.03% Cu — a rejects grade one-seventh of feed — losing only 5.28% of the copper and holding recovery at 94.72%. The enrichment ratio (1.55×) is modest by design: at this feed grade the optimization target is maximum safe rejection, not maximum concentrate grade. Every rejected tonne is a tonne of grinding (15–25 kWh) and flotation capacity returned to the mill.

Test conditions

ItemValue
Feed size fraction0.5–8mm
SeparatorPressurized two-product dense medium cyclone
MediumFerrosilicon + magnetite powder, closed-circuit recovery
Density controlIn-line density gauge with automatic water/medium make-up loop
Value mineral densityChalcopyrite: 4.1–4.3 g/cm³
Gangue densitySilicate gangue: 2.6–2.7 g/cm³
Process water0.1 m³/t, fully recirculated
Medium drainageSieve bends + drain-and-rinse screens

Test methodology

The ore was first wet-screened to remove the −0.5 mm slimes (evaluated separately for flotation). The 0.5–8mm fraction was fed to a ferrosilicon/magnetite suspension; a density-gradient series located the optimum cut density, after which the sample was passed once through a pressurized two-product cyclone. Products were drained on sieve bends, rinsed on drain-and-rinse screens, dewatered, sampled and assayed to compute yield, grade and recovery. Dilute medium was recovered by magnetic separation and densified back to the correct-medium sump under closed-loop density control.

Industrial significance: the 1 Mt/a design

The result carried directly into a preliminary design for a 1,000,000 t/a pre-rejection plant: roughly 380,000 t/a of barren rock intercepted before the mill, concentrator throughput effectively raised by the same amount, and unit operating cost per tonne of copper cut accordingly. This is the template study for making marginal Chinese copper deposits economic.

Market context: Beneficiation for Indian copper & lead-zinc

Frequently asked questions

Q: What recovery did dense medium separation achieve on this copper ore?
A: 94.72% Cu recovery with 38.22% of mass rejected at just 0.03% Cu, from a 0.20% feed (0.5–8 mm).

Q: Will this work on my copper deposit?
A: Density separation depends on liberation size and density contrast, not on locality. A one-tonne representative sample answers the question definitively — washability results within 24 hours of sample receipt.

Start with a one-tonne sample

Send ~1 tonne of representative ore — washability results within 24 hours of sample receipt.

Contact us